Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Prog Urol ; 32(16): 1462-1468, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35941008

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There are no clear recommendations for the management of patients with lymph node invasion discovered during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PCa). Adequate risk stratification could personalize post-surgical adjuvant treatment. Our objective was to identify predictive factors for biochemical relapse (BCR) in patients with lymph node (LN) invasion at the time of radical prostatectomy(RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent RP for high-risk PCa with LN invasion in two academic centres between 2008 and 2019 were included. Patients with metastatic disease or extrapelvic LN involvement were excluded. Following data were collected retrospectively: age, preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason score, clinical and pathological stage, number of metastatic LN and LN density. Outcome was BCR during follow-up. BCR-free survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier method and its association with relevant variables was determined with log-rank test. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included. Median (IQR) age, PSA and follow-up were 64.5 years (55-78), 9.2ng/mL (4.4-20) and 16.1 months (6-27.5), respectively. Twenty patients (77%) had BCR after surgery, accounting for 24-month BCR-free survival of 65%. Patients with LN density > 15% had better survival rates than those with ≤ 15% (40% vs. 0%, respectively, at 24 months; P=0.06) without reaching significance. Cox proportional Hazards analysis could not evidence predictive factors of BCR free-survival. CONCLUSIONS: LN density seemed associated with BCR-free survival within patients with high-risk PCa and positive LN at RP. However, extraprostatic extension, number of positive LN and positive surgical margins were not independent risk factors for BCR. Larger prospective studies with centralized pathological reviews are needed. LEVEL OF PROOF: 3.


Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Metástase Linfática , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Prostatectomia/métodos , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Recidiva
6.
Rev Med Suisse ; 7(296): 1131-2, 1134-6, 2011 May 25.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21721202

RESUMO

Targeted therapies are relatively new molecules available for the oncologist. These drugs target a specific step of the cellular development and interfere with the intracellular signalization pathways. Amongst all others, EGF- and VEGF-pathways are currently targeted by these selective therapies. Modulating EGF and VEGF significantly improves overall survival and progression-free survival for many advanced or metastatic tumors as colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, gastrointestinal stromal tumors or hepatocellular carcinoma. Targeted therapies have a specific action site, a simple administration mode and are relatively well tolerated. In the future these molecules will probably be used "à la carte" for tumors that appear to be refractory to other drugs.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias do Sistema Digestório/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inibidores , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Transdução de Sinais/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Rev Med Suisse ; 7(320): 2404, 2406-8, 2011 Dec 07.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22232870

RESUMO

In common urological practice, testicular torsion is one of the most serious emergencies. Consequences can be devastating for the patient, both physically and psychologically. The primary care physician should be able to quickly identify the pathology and refer immediately the patient to a center with surgical facilities. Rapid diagnosis provides the best chances to save the patient's testicle, which may suffer irreversible damage as soon as 6 hours after the onset of the symptoms. History and clinical examination remain the cornerstones of the diagnosis, and are often sufficient to select patients who need surgical exploration. If time allows it, Doppler Ultrasound can often help distinguish torsion from other scrotal conditions, but cannot be considered as a 100% diagnostic tool.


Assuntos
Torção do Cordão Espermático/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...